Language in Anthony and Brutus’ Speeches Essay

comparability and contrast enthalpys subprogram of cajolery to affect others in his Harfleur speeches with the effectiveness of the language in Anthony and Brutus speeches In atomic number 1 V, hydrogen accustoms grandiloquence very effectively as he persuades the regulator at Harfleur to descent and encourages his troops on state of ward with his Once more than unto the breach speech. This is very equivalent to Anthony and Brutus of Julius Caesar as they use rhetoric to influence the mob firstly Brutus wins the congregation over and they believe the death of Caesar is a well matter and because Anthony turns them around and they end up hating Cassius and Brutus. Henry uses rhetoric to create a number of different effects one of them being to persuade the Governor to surrender. Rhoda Koenig suggests that this scene institutionalizes up the character of this immature and disaffected king, which I disagree with as I believe that this speech shows just how the queer has matured as he is able to bluff his way through as his forces is, really, worn and battered.This speech shows how Henrys actors line be more powerful than his legions, which is similar to Anthony in Julius Caesar who turns the mob into a state of madness just through the use of his oratorical skills. For example, Henry starts his speech with short, sharp sentences How yet resolves the governor of the/ town? This creates an assertive informant and one that drags Henry collarm powerful and stern. This coupled with the use of a rhetorical question puts the Governor in a situation where the benevolence of Henry is in his hands, as if the outcome of his men depends on his decision. This withal removes the responsibility from Henrys shoulders which is a recurring theme passim the play. Henry overly describes what the outcome could look handle if the Governor doesnt surrender The gates of mercy shall be all shut up. The use of a metaphor here, the gates of mercy, refers to He nry as if at one time he starts the battle theres no loss back.This is utilize to scare the Governor so that he believes Harfleur pull up stakes be profane in one case the battle has begun. This, of telephone circuit, is a faade as Henry knows full-well that his military is worn thin and lacking in strength. This demonstrates Henrys good leadership, as he bluffs his way through with confidence. Also, this extract contains lots of monosyllables which make it very powerful and reinforces the threat which forces the Governor to surrender. Bernard Richards raised an interesting nous where he said that Shakespeare wanted to show the full range of war the glamour as well as the squalid and obscene violence. This evoke me as throughout this speech there is talk of atrocities of war much(prenominal) as shrieking daughters bit elsewhere in the play we come over the French think of war as glorious. This is very similar to Brutus in Julius Caesar who has to use rhetoric to chang e the fight to surrender, as they are ab initio angry at the schemers for killing their leader.For example, he uses rhetorical questions to force the bunch to realise that the murder of Caesar will benefit them Who here is so nates Who here is so rude Who is so vile for him drop I offended. The crowd are forced to ask themselves if they would want to be slaves, for example, which they of course answer no. The use of a three-part list too emphasizes this and would forfeit the crowd to remember this more accurately Let him be Caesar This quote shows that Brutuss rhetoric successfully convinces the crowd, although they appear to have missed the point as they want Brutus to be the new Caesar and the sole leader of capital of Italy which is what the conspirators were fighting against. It is in like manner interesting to note that Shakespeares main characters unremarkably speak in blank verse, just here Brutus speaks in prose. This is because prose is the better way to pers uade so has a stronger affect on the crowd. It could also be argued that because he speaks to the low-life characters, they will understand prose better than blank verse. at bottom his speech Brutus also uses repetition which reinforces his message Hear me for cause hear.The use of framing repetition here grabs the crowds attention and makes them listen. He also repeats honour throughout his speech Believe me for mine honour, and have respect for mine honour. This repetition is utilise to emphasize to the crowd that the conspirators cause was honourable and that they have done the right thing while it also serves to remind the crowd how Brutus is an honourable man, which is a affinity with Henry who also takes great care in ensuring the cause for going to war is moral. The repetition would grind it into the crowds heads so that its almost like subliminal messaging. The repetition also shows how Brutus is still unsure himself and that he is stressful to convince himself that they have done the right thing. Henry also uses rhetoric to empower his army and urge them on at Harfluer in what Hal Hinson of the chapiter Post calls the greatest half-time speech in human account statement.Here, Henry is forced to persuade his army that they should not retreat but beset once again Once more unto the breach, dear friends, once more. Similarly to Brutus, Henry uses framing repetition to encourage his army to blow Harfleur once more. The repetition helps to reinforce the message and will stick in their minds through the battle. Also in this quote, he uses an endearing pronoun friend. This affects the army as they will opinion that they are all friends of the King and will have a surge of confidence. This will help the army to reduce whatever they face, even though they have had to retreat. Interestingly, this contrast to what the Chorus says in the preceding scene as he states that the great British are invading France when really they are being forced to retreat. Henry also uses alliteration But when the blast of war blows in our ears. The use of plosive speech sound alliteration here creates a powerful sound which suggests that the English army are powerful enough to defeat the French. This also shows Henrys passion as if its bursting out of him as he desperately wants his men to survive as he feels guilty that the war may not have an honourable cause. Also is this speech, sibilance is used Stiffen the sinews. This also creates quite an obstreperous sound which would be passed onto the soldiers and make them feel aggressive and willing to fight. Henry also uses figurative language Let it nose like the brass carom. This simile likens the mind prying to a cannon an item associated with war which would rile up the soldiers and also remind them that they are at war, its kill or be killed. Another simile used refers to Alexander the Great On, on, you imposingst English like so many Alexanders.Here, Henry likens his army to a group of A lexander the Greats. Alexander the Great is a figure of Hellenic legend which states that he conquered the Persian Empire. It also says that he was often reckless with his own life and his soldiers as he believed he was indestructible. This would encourage his men and fill them with confidence as Alexander was a great warrior and Henrys army will feel equally invincible. Shakespeares Elizabethan auditory modality were very interested in Greek culture so the simile would have been more relevant and had more effect than it would on our society who have a lesser interest. Also, in this quote he addresses the noblest English while further on he addresses the good yeomen. Henry directly addresses each social class as his army was compiled of a number of different classes, even nationalities. King Henry V was known for uniting people under him as he prevented a civil war between the Church and the Government and this unison is shown in the scene between Gower, Fluellen, Jamy and MacMo rris.This scene also, as James Shapiro suggests, prophetically anticipates the notion of a united kingdom. Although these nations were far from united in 1599, when the play was written as England and Ireland were at war, and some were very irrelevant during Henrys reign. For example, James Shapiro criticizes that Henry says the Scots may attack yet here they are united. This would make each soldier feel important, needed and a friend of the kings, which would, ultimately, provide the soldiers with confidence to fight, and beat, the French. Likewise, gradation Anthony in Julius Caesar also addresses his crowd individually while manipulating them until they run revolt around capital of Italy Friends, Romans, countrymen. Anthony immediately begins with a three-part list which grabs his audiences attentions and the first word used is friends. This instantly makes the crowd warm to him as he is speaking to them as equals.This is similar to Henry who calls his army the noble English a nd good yeomen, while it contrasts with Brutus who says, Romans, countrymen, and lovers, as if lovers is an afterthought. This may hint at why Henry and Anthony were successful at convincing their audience while Brutus failed, because Henry and Anthony allowed the audience to warm to them while Brutus did not. Another way Anthony wins his crowd over is by using repetition And Brutus is an honourable man. This is repeated at regular intervals throughout his speech and each time it becomes more nipping. The sarcastic tone induces the crowd to question whether killing Caesar was an honourable thing.Here, in the identical way as Brutus, he uses subliminal messaging however he uses it against Brutus and to much better effect as the crowd end up rampaging across Rome. In conclusion, Henry and Anthony use rhetoric and their oratorical skills very well combining repetition, friendly language, and other techniques to persuade their respective crowds to see their way of thinking. Brutus, however, fails to convince his crowd (or is unable to deliver a speech worthy of Anthonys) which goes to show how good Anthonys speech is. Henry manages to convince the Governor to surrender, and convince his battered army to continue, while Anthony manages to convince an audience who love Brutus, to hunt him down. Brutus, on the other hand, cannot prevent the people of Rome from turning against him as he didnt endear himself to the crowd.