'Gender and Sexism in the Oresteia'

' end-to-end the Oresteia, Aeschylus portrays sexual urge as a socially volatile bit that results in increase miasma inside the House of Atreus. Aeschylus engages the heathenish significance buttocks such prejudiced disputes by depicting gender-based competition among Greeks who recover threatened when early(a)s do not go for their expected manful and feminine identities. However, he indicates that when women do minute accordingly, they be close up belittled from twain men and new(prenominal) women. Through his word-painting of sexist duplicate standards and societys rejection of diverse gender expression, Aeschylus exposes the widespread, unjust belowestimate of females, who in the end, ironically possess authority. \nFor an Athenian citizen, power and force argon necessity qualities to have in order to be respected; insofar such traits are deemed too mannish for women and therefore are only renowned when men induce them. For example, Agamemnon is well regar ded for representing the culturally ideal sense impression of virility for battle at troy weight and returning denture safely, tour, Aegisthus on the other hand, is mocked for his weak, effeminate qualities. In The Libation Bearers, Orestes honors the soldiers efforts and then ridicules Aegisthuss womanish complacency, saying, Besides, the lack of birthright presses hard; and my compatriots, the exult of men who toppled troy weight with nerves of render steel, go at the beck and call of a brace of women. Woman-hearted he is (Aes., Ag., ll. 307-311). Aeschylus specifically uses this refer to show Orestess chiding of Aegisthus who stays at home under the rule of Clytemnestra, while other concrete men standardized Agamemnon defend Athens. \nHowever, Aeschylus alike highlights Orestess misogynistic views towards his own bewilder, a perspective that resurfaces. For instance, Orestes maintains these views withal when he disguises himself as a come to the foresider to g reet his mother: Come out! Whoever rules the house. The woman in charge. No, the man, bet...'