.

Tuesday, June 18, 2019

Law Bachelor Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 3750 words

Law Bachelor - Essay ExampleYang. So, Ying and Yang cannot enforce Meis initial offer.IntentionMei, Ying and Yang were colleagues, and not professional gamblers. The general presumption is that in that location was no legal intention involved. However, the presumption can be rebutted, taking into consideration the seriousness of the consequences. But assessed objectively, the presumption cant be set aside due to the lack of any written or verbal contract acceptance of Meis initial offer.Consideration Finally, Mei refused to sh atomic number 18 the winnings, although initially she volunteered to buy one utmost(a) ticket on behalf of them all. Courts volition not intervene, for a contract didnt exist at all. It was a verbal contract till four hebdomadally tickets were purchased with the $120 won from the first ticket. The final instance is an evidence akin to Australian Woollen Mills Pty Ltd v Commonwealth (1954). Meis proposal was merely a statement and not an offer capable of ac ceptance. This mentioned clearly in what is alleged to be an offer should have been intended to give rise, on the doing of the act to an obligationin the absence seizure of such an intention, actual or imputed, the alleged offer cannot lead to a contract there is indeed in such a case no true offer. (Graw Stephen, An Introduction to the Contract 5th edition, Lawbook Co. 2005, p. 41) . Question 2 Ying was tired of her long musical career so on 3 April she offered to sell her balmy to Molly for $3500, saying that she would keep the offer open for ten days. Molly already had two pianos in her shop and was therefore reluctant to buy it. However, always ready to try for a bargain, she replied on 6 April with a verbal offer to buy it for $2500. This was not acceptable to Ying. In the meantime, Molly had... During 2003 the life of an aborigine artist, Albert Namatjira, was celebrated in a number of ways, including an exhibition in the Art Gallery of South Australia of his paintings from the 1930s to 1958. Albert Namatjira had a number of relatives who also produced similar paintings of varying quality. Alberts paintings are more valuable than those of other family members.Boondok, a dealer in paintings, located a painting of a desert landscape in colour with the image Namatjira written in the bottom corner of the painting. He paid $50 for it. This painting was painted by one of Alberts cousins and was worth approximately $500. Boondok knew this. Albert Namatjira always sign-language(a) his paintings, Albert Namatjira in the bottom corner of each painting he did.Boondok placed his landscape painting in his gallerys front window with a price traverse of $8,000 on it. Tex, a tourist, saw Boondoks painting on display. Tex said to Boondok, I have always wanted a genuine Namatjira and here it is. I will buy it. Boondok replied, It is always nice to buy something that pleases you. Hope you enjoy the painting.The plaintiff bought a bottle of wine from the defendant.Th e plaintiff was injured due to the sudden acoustic projection of a hidden stopper when he opened the bottle at his home.

No comments:

Post a Comment